Reply To: Mistaken statement in intro to Borden case

Forums Mistakes in the casebook Mistaken statement in intro to Borden case Reply To: Mistaken statement in intro to Borden case

#1103
Barton BeebeBarton Beebe
Keymaster

Wow, thank you all for such a thorough consideration of Bordengate. In light of all this information, I think the prudent course is to adopt Bob’s proposed amendment, which threads the needle nicely. I’ll do this in the next edition of the casebook to come out this summer.

Thanks, this is a welcome break from the amicus Jeanne Fromer and I are writing in Brunetti, in which we use our data to list out, among other things, all the profanities and incredibly foul language that triggered _simultaneous_ 2a and 2d refusals from PTO.